November 5 2010 Copyright 2010 Business Research Services Inc. 301-229-5561 All rights reserved.
Defense Contract Awards Procurement Watch Links to Prior Issues |
Teaming Opportunities Recently Certified 8(a)s |
Recent 8(a) Contract Awards Washington Insider Calendar of Events |
Subcontractors’ Accounting Systems Face Scrutiny By Glenda Tysinger In the past, a contractor could expect an accounting system audit only prior to the award of its first cost reimbursement type contract. Today the requirement to have an accounting system approved by DCAA or a reputable firm prior to award has expanded to other contract types as well. Why is there an increase in DCAA preaward audits? The July 26, 2010, appearance of Patrick J. Fitzgerald, director of DCAA, before the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan, provides some good insight. About 120 contractors hold more than 300 prime contracts with contract ceiling amounts of $93.2 billion. As a part of the audit process, the prime contractor’s policies and procedures are reviewed to ensure that the proposed subcontract costs are fair and reasonable. DCAA reported that all of the estimating systems audited were inadequate and said the estimating practices were deficient for ensuring fair and reasonable subcontract prices. FAR 42.202(e)(2) clearly states that it is the prime contractor’s responsibility to oversee its subcontractors. In one instance cited by DCAA, upon examination of the subcontractor’s records, it discovered that approximately 40% of the proposed direct costs of the subcontractor were unsupported. Additionally, when DCAA reviewed lower-tier subcontractors, it found that their direct costs were supported with only rough estimates of costs and absolutely no supporting detail. DCAA provided numerous other examples of inadequate accounting system support for both prime and lower tier subcontracts. As a result, Mr. Fitzgerald asserted that: Prime contractors must be held accountable for establishing fair and reasonable subcontract prices. Prime contractors have the responsibility to manage their subcontracts and have a fiduciary responsibility to monitor the subcontractor performance and control costs. Large prime contractors fear that the actions of subcontractors may cause them to violate FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct. Large primes are protecting themselves by requiring all subcontractors to have an approved accounting system prior to award of a subcontract. A small business subcontractor should hire a reputable firm to have such an audit conducted and to approve their accounting system. Additionally, the Recovery Act places more scrutiny on how American dollars are spent. The reporting required includes: *Government Contract and order number
Contracts being let under ARRA are requiring the contractors to undergo accounting system audits and to ensure they are meeting the above requirements. For non-major contractors, there are 12 key elements that are required; no exceptions. The accounting system must demonstrate the ability to: *Segregate direct costs from indirect costs (FAR Part 31);
The audit focus has shifted to determining if the accounting systems of both prime and subcontractor systems can be relied upon prior to contract award. This approach assumes it is more cost effective to minimize the likelihood of contractor overbillings prior to award as opposed to recovering overbillings after they have occurred. Small business subcontractors must now have an adequate accounting system that:
Good luck on your next DCAA audit! Glenda Tysinger is a Senior Manager with Federal Strategies Group, LLC. She provides government contract and management consulting, accounting and DCAA audit services to the government contracting industry. She can be reached via email at GlendaT@FedStrat.com.
|