Set-Aside Alert logo   
    
Federal Market Intelligence
for Small Business

Front Page Headlines | Calendar of Events | Contract Awards | Newly-Certified Firms | DoD Small Business Awards | Teaming | Procurement Watch | Past Issues |
Dec 3 2021    Next issue: Dec 17 2021

Two courts have upheld federal contractor vaccination orders

Dozens more lawsuits are pending in federal courts

      President Joe Biden’s executive order mandating COVID-19 vaccines for all federal contractors has been upheld--temporarily--by two courts to date.

      Many more cases are on dockets around the country. Republican attorney generals of 23 states have filed, or joined in filing, lawsuits against the federal contractor vaccine requirements.

      Some states also have pushed back by passing legislation that purports to authorize various exemptions to the federal mandate or to ban such mandates.

      Legal experts say the lawsuits are likely to face obstacles because the federal government generally has the right to set the terms of its contracts.

      Meanwhile, implementation is moving forward. The General Services Administration says that 95% of the approximately 12,000 federal contractors with GSA Multiple-Award Schedules contracts have accepted modifications to their contracts incorporating the vaccine mandates, according to Mark Lee, the Federal Acquisition Service’s assistant commissioner for policy and compliance.

      For other FAS contracts, compliance is at 91%, Lee said. He made his remarks at the Coalition for Government Procurement’s recent fall conference, according to Federal News Network.

      “Thank you for the tremendous response on the modification,” Lee told vendors participating in the online event.

What’s in the vaccine mandate

      As previously reported, President Biden announced the vaccine mandate for federal workers and contractors in September, and the White House’s Safer Federal Workplace Task Force issued several guidelines in November. Vaccinations for all vendor employees are due by Jan. 18. There are limited exemptions that may be granted by employers.

Lawsuits and court rulings

      There have been a number of lawsuits filed against the vaccine mandate by conservative-led state governments and others, some calling the orders “federal overreach” and others alleging it violates procurement laws or other laws. To date, two courts have denied requests to temporarily block the mandate:

  • In September, the state of Arizona went to court seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the federal contractor mandate. Those requests were denied on Nov. 10 by the US District Court for the District of Arizona.
  • In the “Altschuld et. al v. Raimondo et al” lawsuit, more than 30 federal employees and contractors filed to block the vaccination order on an emergency basis, alleging their individual rights were being infringed upon, causing immediate harm. The judge for the US District Court in Washington, DC denied their request on Nov. 8.
  • Seven states (Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, South Carolina, Utah and West Virginia) filed a lawsuit against the vaccine mandate in a federal court in Georgia. A hearing is set for Dec. 3.
  • The state of Florida filed for a preliminary injunction in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. A hearing is set for Dec. 7.
  • Attorneys general from Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming have signed on to a lawsuit filed in a federal district court in Missouri.
  • The states of Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee filed a joint lawsuit to block the mandate in a federal district court in Kentucky.
  • The state of Texas also is suing on its own.

      There also are many separate lawsuits against the Labor Dept.’s vaccination rules for large private employers and the Health and Human Services Dept.’s vaccine orders for healthcare workers.

      And legislatures in North Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming recently have approved new laws that purport to create additional exemptions to federal vaccine mandates or to ban vaccine mandates altogether, according to an analysis by attorneys Elizabeth A. Lalik, partner, and Lauren M. Bridenbaugh, associate, of the Littler law firm.

Legal analysis

      The anti-mandate lawsuits are likely to face an uphill battle because there’s a long history of the federal government setting its own terms for its contractors, according to an analysis by Bloomberg Law.

      Marc Antonetti, employment partner with Baker & Hostetler LLP, told Bloomberg Law the government’s argument is strong. “If you want to do business with the United States, you have to comply with their rules,” he said.

More information:
Littler analysis: https://bit.ly/3le9tEx
Bloomberg Law analysis: https://bit.ly/3p5eZKL
Federal News Network report: https://bit.ly/31afniV

     

Inside this edition:

Two courts have upheld federal contractor vaccination orders

Debt default threatened

$15 minimum wage starts Jan 30

Non-displacement EO is back

Labor Surplus Area list is halved

Scorecard said under review

Rule for past performance

Hispanic small biz growth

Polaris supply chain risks

Column: In-Person Events are Back -- What’s Your Plan?

Washington Insider:

  • SBA released a 2022-26 strategic plan, or did it?
  • GAO report on 2021 protests

Headline Correction

Coronavirus Update



Copyright © 2021 Business Research Services Inc. All rights reserved.

Set-Aside Alert is published by
Business Research Services, Inc.
PO Box 42674
Washington DC 20015
1-202-285-0931
Fax: 877-516-0818
brspubs@sba8a.com
www.sba8a.com
hits counter